This report sets out a conceptual map for potential elements of a science-for-policy advisory ecosystem. The aim of this map is not to propose an ideal system, but rather to highlight how elements need to connect with each other at multiple levels; to allow us to ask how all involved in evidence production, mobilisation and…
ABSTRACT: Many academics have strong incentives to influence policymaking, but may not know where to start. We searched systematically for, and synthesised, the ‘how to’ advice in the academic peer-reviewed and grey literatures. We condense this advice into eight main recommendations: (1) Do high quality research; (2) make your research relevant and readable; (3) understand…
¿Patria Boba o Patria Pila? El valor de tener un sistema de asesoramiento científico? – Dr Jan Marco Mueller, IIASA – Presentation from INGSA-LAC Colombia Workshop August 2019
Presentation from Dr Jan-Marco Mueller on Models of Science Advice given at the Oman INGSA Workshop 2019
An extended Principles and Structures presentation from Sir Peter Gluckman to the Oman INGSA workshop 2019
Principles of Science Advice & Understanding Risk Within that Context – Peter Gluckman for Vilnius, Lithuania workshop, June 2019
Reward the creation of analyses for policymakers that are inclusive, rigorous, transparent and accessible, urge Christl A. Donnelly and colleagues.
Evidence synthesis supports well-founded policymaking and public debate. The common question ‘What is the evidence for that?’ could be usefully rephrased as ‘Has sufficient synthesis of the evidence been done in relation to that?’. While typically asked in the former way, it is really the latter that is of interest. Across disciplines and policy areas…
End of content
End of content