A great scientist doesn’t necessarily make an effective science adviser — but schooling and practice can help to bridge the gap. Earlier this year, Nature asked science-policy specialists which country is particularly good at ensuring science is factored into government decisions. The question mystified many respondents. “Not aware of any,” wrote one. “None have enviable systems,” wrote…
Findings from INGSA-Europe’s pilot project: the INCLUSIVE project. The report pairs reviews of some of the relevant literature on language, culture, science advice and negotiation with first-hand accounts from practitioners, policymakers and researchers who engaged with the project across its duration.
INGSA INCLUSIVE project evidence review – Exploring the role of language, culture and translation in policy negotiations: A view from International Relations and Political Science by: Nathan Alan-Lee – University College London, School of Slavonic and East European Studies
INGSA INCLUSIVE project evidence review – The Impact of language choice and culture in policy and science advice in Europe: A view from Linguistics and Translation studies by: Géraldine Bengsch, PhD – University of York, Department of Language and Linguistic Science
INGSA2024 Viewpoints is the companion publication to the Kigali conference, featuring many of the speakers from the meeting, providing additional insight and provocations on the key issues facing science advice and science diplomacy. The legacy document from the 5th International Conference on Science Advice to Governments, INGSA2024 – The Transformation Imperative: Expanded Evidence for Inclusive…
End of content
End of content